26.09.2017, 07:38
(Dieser Beitrag wurde zuletzt bearbeitet: 26.09.2017, 07:39 von ColorfulPockets.
Bearbeitungsgrund: calculated mean wrong
)
3. (with limit)
Linear 29 lol. I could have had a 27 with an 8 move skeleton to 3E7C, but I kinda just stopped looking because I thought there wasn't anything good after 12 moves to 6C with one twisted corner. All of my ways of reducing to 5C only canceled 2, so I assumed it would be unlikely to find a way to cancel more than 5 on the next two comms (since I already checked the majority of ways this would be possible without nested insertions while checking the 6C skeleton). Unfortunately, there was a comm that canceled 4. I don't know if I would have found it within the time limit anyway.
All on inverse:
L' U // 2 pairs (2)
D' R2 D' L D' // 2x2x2 (7)
R F L' U L // 2x2x3 (12)
R U2 // place cross edge for the face with better EO (14)
F R F' // F2L-1 (17)
B' R2 B R' B' R B R' U R2 U' R2 // LL skip! (29)
Solution: R2 U R2 U' R B' R' B R B' R2 B F R' F' U2 R' L' U' L F' R' D L' D R2 D U' L
29 moves.
24, 26, 29 = 26.33 mean
Linear 29 lol. I could have had a 27 with an 8 move skeleton to 3E7C, but I kinda just stopped looking because I thought there wasn't anything good after 12 moves to 6C with one twisted corner. All of my ways of reducing to 5C only canceled 2, so I assumed it would be unlikely to find a way to cancel more than 5 on the next two comms (since I already checked the majority of ways this would be possible without nested insertions while checking the 6C skeleton). Unfortunately, there was a comm that canceled 4. I don't know if I would have found it within the time limit anyway.
All on inverse:
L' U // 2 pairs (2)
D' R2 D' L D' // 2x2x2 (7)
R F L' U L // 2x2x3 (12)
R U2 // place cross edge for the face with better EO (14)
F R F' // F2L-1 (17)
B' R2 B R' B' R B R' U R2 U' R2 // LL skip! (29)
Solution: R2 U R2 U' R B' R' B R B' R2 B F R' F' U2 R' L' U' L F' R' D L' D R2 D U' L
29 moves.
24, 26, 29 = 26.33 mean