(16.03.2018, 19:07)ColorfulPockets schrieb: According to Michael Young and Brandon Harnish, it is clearly against the WCA regulations. However, this isn't the WCA, and it is a smart way to do FMC, so you can choose to count it if you wantThanks ColorfulPockets for the research
and I changed the result from ?29? to DNF.
Perhaps interesting to all, why I "run" this challenge here:
I want to give others and me the possibility to do attempts in near-competition conditions. An obvious non-WCA-conform solution is therefore a DNF for me.
But I don't want to be a comp-judge/delegate and I normally don't control the solutions and don't count the moves.
IMO everyone should check his solutions himself. And as you have noticed: There is no 1., 2., in the list, it is not a "true" ranking for me but the possibility for everyone to compare the results easily.
It is not a huge effort and the generation of the scrambles is easy, too. But it is a bit of work and so I allow me - if I see something interesting like L3 - to give a silly comment .
Methode C-3PO: So lange auf den Würfel einreden, bis er sich entnervt freiwillig selbst zurückdreht.