Themabewertung:
  • 0 Bewertung(en) - 0 im Durchschnitt
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Things cubers want non-cubers to understand
#1
Things cubers want non-cubers to understand

Hello, non-cubers. We're cubers. Because cubing is a relatively minor hobby often associated with geek culture, there are many misconceptions about Rubik's Cube and cubing. Here are some things we want you to understand.

About cubing


Even if you never learn to solve a cube, we think you should know these things.
  • Most everyone above the age of say 9 can learn to solve a Rubik's Cube. Simple methods are just step-by-step procedures; you just need to learn a few sequences of moves, recognize patterns, and follow rules.
  • There are ways to approach the Rubik's Cube at least partially mathematically, but most speedcubing methods involve no math. Some steps are more or less intuitive, but there is very little that speedcubers invent on the spot. Other steps are straight pattern recognition; when we see this pattern, we we already know to apply this sequence of moves. Thinking is slow; brain-deadness is fast.
  • Although many cubers also have interests in math or science, knowledge in either subject helps very little in cubing. Many world-class speedcubers are not good at math.

Fact check aka "We know when you're lying (or remembering it wrong)"

  • No one can solve the Rubik's Cube regularly in 5 seconds. The record average is about 8 seconds. If your friend or some guy on the street/TV/YouTube solved the cube in 5 seconds, either he's cheating, you're exaggerating, or we know him well and it was an easy or lucky solve.
  • Although every configuration of the Rubik's Cube can be solved in at most 20 moves (counting a 180-degree turn as one move), a typical speedsolve can take 50+ moves. If you saw someone solve a cube in 20 moves, he was cheating or it wasn't meant to be a proper solve.
  • The chance of solving a well-scrambled Rubik's Cube by accident is considerably lower than winning a billion-dollar lottery. You never solved it by total chance after playing around with it for 3 days.
  • If you solve 5 sides, the last side is automatically solved. You never managed to solve 5 sides but couldn't get the last one.
  • The Rubik's Cube consists not of 54 independent stickers, but rather of 8 corner pieces (each with 3 stickers) and 12 edge pieces (each with 2 stickers) around a center axis with 6 fixed center pieces. Solving a side ("face") of stickers means nothing if the pieces aren't solved, and no solution involves solving one side at a time. It's very unlikely that you solved 3 sides but couldn't get the other 3; solving 3 sides places enough constraint that most pieces are in fact solved, but if you really managed this, you should know that solving side-by-side is complete nonsense. If you tell us this, we'll assume you're lying or remembering it wrong.

Watching cubers solve


We're happy when you take any interest in our hobby! But it's even better if you avoid some misunderstandings.
  • If we're turning a cube without looking at it, there are several possibilities. If our eyes are open, we're probably
    scrambling it (we do this half the time), or
    actually solving it with our eyes open. A speedsolve using the most popular method takes only 7 looks. We look at the cube throughout for serious solves, but for casual solves, we might start a step and look away to do something else, only looking again before the next step.
It's possible that
  • we're actually solving without looking ("blindfolded"). In this case, we must have spent some time memorizing the cube and probably have our eyes closed.
  • In a blindfolded solve, we first need to memorize the cube. There is nothing to touch to distinguish the colors.
  • Pieces of a normal Rubik's Cube can accidentally come out ("POP") during a speedsolve.
  • Putting this back in is not cheating. If we put pieces back in incorrectly, we may end up in an unsolvable state and only realize this at the end of the solve. Taking out pieces to correct this is not cheating; in fact, for solvable configurations, solving as usual is often considerably faster than taking out pieces and putting them back in.

Scrambling for a cuber


If you ask, many cubers will let you scramble their cube. Don't just grab them, though, and keep these things in mind.
  • Don't try to (badly) imitate our turning speed and drop the cube. This can damage pieces and put the cube out of tune. Many competition-level speedcubers spend a lot of effort fine-tuning their cubes.
These are not good scrambles:
  • Doing four 90-degree turns in the same direction on the same side does nothing.
  • Only turning parallel sides doesn't do much.
  • Always turning a side together with the opposing side keeps the corners solved.
To properly scramble a cube, at least change the side you are turning after each move.
  • As long as you scramble properly, say for at least 25 moves, looking at the cube while it is being scrambled does not help us solve it. If you grab the cube from us and hide it behind your back, we'll be worried that you'll drop it.
  • Official rules allow up to 15 seconds of inspection beore starting a solve. We don't like it when you hide the cube, give it back, and start timing right away, especially without warning.

--------------------------------------------------

Shotaro Makisumi, as of 2011-06-16
Quelle
[Bild: img.php?id=2009DUMO01&ranking=NR&event_1...vent_3=sq1]
Zitieren
#2
Klasse! Ich glaube, das übersetze ich mir mal, druck's aus und leg's in meine Handtasche, für den Fall, dass mich mal jemand mit den üblichen Sätzen (Ich hab damals nur xy geschafft, bla bla) zusülzt Wink
Oder noch schöner: Übersetzen, optisch etwas aufpeppen, ausdrucken, einrahmen und über mein Würfelregal hängen, hihi! Heart
Liebe Grüße,
Beatrice Heart

[Bild: img.php?id=2009GLOE01&ranking=NR&event_1...nsparent=1]
Zitieren
#3
Wenn das jetzt noch absolut jeder nicht-Cuber wüsste, dann gäbe es zumindest schonmal über 50% weniger dumme Kommentare....
Zitieren
#4
Und genau das ist der Grund wiso ich in der oeffentlichkeit bzw. In der Schule nichtmehr Cube.
Zitieren
#5
(16.06.2011, 07:13)deepSubDiver schrieb: (...)
  • There are ways to approach the Rubik's Cube at least partially mathematically, but most speedcubing methods involve no math. Some steps are more or less intuitive, but there is very little that speedcubers invent on the spot. Other steps are straight pattern recognition; when we see this pattern, we we already know to apply this sequence of moves. Thinking is slow; brain-deadness is fast.
    (...)

  • Official rules allow up to 15 seconds of inspection beore starting a solve. We don't like it when you hide the cube, give it back, and start timing right away, especially without warning.

--------------------------------------------------

Shotaro Makisumi, as of 2011-06-16
Quelle

Zitieren
#6
er spricht aus meinem Herzen. Marry Me Big Grin danke für den Post Frank.
Zitieren
#7
Es drängt mich unbarmherzig das Ganze zu nehmen und einfach ma auf Mist-Book zu posten ^^
Ach wär das schön wenn sowas wirklich etwas bringen würde...

EDIT: "Status updates must be less than 420 characters. You have entered 5,266 characters here."
Lucky: 18.68 <-- :ugly: --> Non-Lucky: 17.81 3o5: 22.06 10o12: 23.59 Ao50: 25.33
Full Fridrich dank Björn ^^
Make everything OK
Zitieren
#8
(16.06.2011, 07:13)deepSubDiver schrieb:
Watching cubers solve


We're happy when you take any interest in our hobby! But it's even better if you avoid some misunderstandings.
  • If we're turning a cube without looking at it, there are several possibilities. If our eyes are open, we're probably
    scrambling it (we do this half the time), or
    actually solving it with our eyes open. A speedsolve using the most popular method takes only 7 looks. We look at the cube throughout for serious solves, but for casual solves, we might start a step and look away to do something else, only looking again before the next step.

  • Pieces of a normal Rubik's Cube can accidentally come out ("POP") during a speedsolve.
  • Putting this back in is not cheating. If we put pieces back in incorrectly, we may end up in an unsolvable state and only realize this at the end of the solve. Taking out pieces to correct this is not cheating; in fact, for solvable configurations, solving as usual is often considerably faster than taking out pieces and putting them back in.

Passiert mir auch immer: Die sagen dann so was wie O.o der schaut ja gar nicht hin und weiß es auswendig und die meinenn "Ist dein Würfel jetzt nicht kaputt weil ein Teil raus"gebrochen" ist? " Tongue

Event / Single / 3 of 5 / 10 of 12 / of 100 (Click to View)
Zitieren
#9
Oder sie wollen den Cube scramblen und sagen :Wenn ich den mische kriegst du das nicht mehr hin.
Zitieren
#10
(16.06.2011, 12:07)Tommy schrieb: Es drängt mich unbarmherzig das Ganze zu nehmen und einfach ma auf Mist-Book zu posten ^^
Ach wär das schön wenn sowas wirklich etwas bringen würde...

EDIT: "Status updates must be less than 420 characters. You have entered 5,266 characters here."

Hat Shotaro dort gepostet, daher hab ich's Wink
[Bild: img.php?id=2009DUMO01&ranking=NR&event_1...vent_3=sq1]
Zitieren


Gehe zu:


Benutzer, die gerade dieses Thema anschauen: 1 Gast/Gäste